Don Carns Jr vs. Scott Cline

Oil and gas production has been the main concern and interest in every single nation today. Without these vital and major resources any state are almost consider a weak or impossible to survive. Hence, the production of oil and gas require some natural damage and consequences after each season of this process. The main damage and harm is environmental and ecological to bio system and putting in danger the water quality along with other things around. Basically, the writers Don Carns Jr. and Scott Cline is against about the gas and oil production. Since in the process of drilling might occur several accidents which can result to leak of oil or gas in between land along poisoning the out surface and future of.
The Don Carns Jr. is most conscious and worry about the real outcome besides of scientific explanation about the future of drilling. Which leads that Don Carns Jr. is against about gas and oil production. Due to causing damage to water, environment and people who lives around that place.


On the other hand, Scott Cline is technically stands for and support the gas and oil production.

Today how to survive

Do you like smoothie? Of course I do, who doesn't like it. The combination of our daily meal have to consist from different items, not solely in one item. The message of this video is trying to illustrate that, if you break the human nature law-than it will break you in the end. The notion is to adopting a normal eating habit and well-balanced diet. No matter the fact, whether you vegetarian, Buddhist, Muslim etc. Since, the video is not just about how in 21st century people killing animals or the whole process how the meet from Sam's Club came from, we already know about it. With that being said, it shows how society is divided into many different slides like wedding cake, each consisting the general ingredient but the taste is different. People today, tend to eat anything fast and delicious due to lack of knowledge how to prepare food, time, financially broken, or just because I don't want to.
However, I would say that besides of manufactured/processed food every citizen should consume more fresh vegetables along with daily diet, in order to prevent from serious consequences such as diabetics, heart disease, high blood pressure, etc.
I would say that what all problem we created and only solution is to teach about how and how much to consume, but to stand up against human cruelty or anything sort of this topic. Because, if to look this in broader picture-it doesn't make any sense in the end. Here is an example: Back in 1990's the Russian president decided to ban alcohol consumption and applied strict laws against it. The result was society started to drink perfumes, make their beverages in basement of house and killed millions of people every year. So, think about now, what would happen if state will ban consumption of meat or put limit on meal plan.

Compare and Contrasting-similarities and differences/ Community duty

• Opposing views on a topic
• Different takes on a topic

Different approaches:

• Messages/themes
• Purpose
• Intended Audience
• How the writers handle opposing views
• Tone/Diction/Writing style
• Genre/Form
• Evidence used to support the argument
• Reasoning-connections between claims and evidence
• Organized-is it focused? Is it clear?
• Who's the writer? (ethos)
• Pathos-use of anecdotes and other emotionally charged examples.

Structures:

Community duty



As a citizen of country the government provides basic needs to society like: highways, free parks etc. But, yes all of those things are coming from tax money. However, I strongly believe that every person should do community duty. Because, it will not solely helps to person itself, but also to the community, neighborhood, as well as to government spending. It greatly helps to person improve some certain skills and learn something beside the college degree or yet apply some knowledge into practice. Today up to 80% of all jobs require some contribution  hours and experience on that field one's hold certain degree.

Blog Questions/Answers

• First I was debating among several controversial issues such as American-Mexican border, Corporate Tax, Middle East. Albeit, I decided to go with-Abortion. Because it taking great attention not only inside the U.S. but even abroad.
• I'm still looking for reliable sources from internet and textbook (from the library). Because I want to provide scientific based/scholarly research information, but not just an opinion  or debate.
• My main question in this topic and assignment is address to the history of Abortion on how it actually allowed, under what circumstances or laws and what might be the best solution to decrease the number of abortion through new laws or programs ( since its impossible to stop it, because people always can find a way to do it, if its necessary).
• Every piece of information is essential and helps me to build strong argument and make a good flow on sentences/paragraph.

The Story of an Hour

• Josephine tells her sister, Mrs. Mallard, that Brently Mallard (husband) has died.
• Mrs.Mallard has a heart disease
• Mrs. Mallard cries, then runs up to her bedroom and locks herself in
• She begins to reflect on the event/death and begins to think she's free
• Josephine interrupts and brings her back downstairs
• Brently opens the door and he's unaware of any accident
• Mrs. Mallard dies.



Mending Wall by Robert Frost

• Its spring time
• Two neighbors have a wall between their properties.
• There's a hole in the wall made by hunters
• Speaker tells the neighbor and they begin repairing the wall
• Speaker begins question the need for a wall
• Neighbor says good fences make good neighbors
• Speaker questions neighbor
• Neighbor repeats himself